wanted me to tell you “good night” for him.
Mickey Rourke also wanted to ask you — assuming you have any pertinent information — to help him understand why he’s morphing into James Woods.
If you aren’t able to volunteer any theories, Mickey Rourke says, thanks anyway, no worries, he’ll just keep asking around.
Mainly, he ( “he” = “Mickey Rourke”) just wanted to say goodnight.








13 responses so far ↓
1 Dallas on Jan 14, 2008 at 9:45 pm
Mickey shouldn’t worry; the Spader is just a stage in his eventual transformation into Betty White. The last few stages are somewhat painful, but mercifully brief.
[Reply to this]
2 Chris P. on Jan 14, 2008 at 10:43 pm
I think, if any morphing is in the offering, it’s in the direction of Billy Mays rather than Mr. Woods. I see no mediocre crime dramas co-starring Jeri Ryan in Mr. Rourke’s future. However, the idea of him selling me products that include a free set of knives is quite plausable. Indeed, I think television salesmen are too upbeat and enthusiastic these days. What this country needs is someone like the Mickey to tell us, the American people, while smoking a half pack of Kool’s during his three a.m. infomercial, to sit down, shut up, and buy a fishing rod that’s the size of a large fountain pen!!!!
Good Night Mick! And God bless capitalisim!!
[Reply to this]
Reply from Chris P. on January 14, 2008:
Capitalism!! Yeah, that’s it. With only two “i’s” instead of three! See, this is why we need strong, D-list actors to lead us into correct spelling!!!
3 Tim on Jan 14, 2008 at 10:43 pm
Is Mickey a down-and-out actor this week? Or is he an unsuccessful, over-the-hill boxer this week, and back to the lagging acting career thing next week? I lose track.
My guess is he’s doing the boxer thing in that picture, displayed by his obvious “Yeah, I’m wearing a ruffled shirt and a bolo tie, what are you gonna do about it?” look.
I’m back, by the way…
[Reply to this]
Reply from "Sticks" on January 15, 2008:
That’s not a look, that’s just how his face is stuck these days. Joan Rivers has more emoting ability in what’s left of her face.
4 A.M.P. on Jan 14, 2008 at 11:22 pm
I have to admit I thoroughly enjoyed Sin City, particularly Mr. Rourke’s performance, and so I’ve been thinking…perhaps the direction he needs to continue in is to be so heavily coated in makeup, prosthetics, and digital effects as to be totally unrecognizable save for his half-pack-a-day voice. I think that with careful judgement and more movie roles where the makeup department makes him even more anvil-faced than he already is, Mr. Rourke’s acting career has some promise yet.
[Reply to this]
Reply from Brian O. on January 15, 2008:
Hey, it worked for Ron Perlman.
Reply from Chris P. on January 15, 2008:
…and Tim Curry (…without the benifit of CG, I might add).
5 Mr. Slick on Jan 14, 2008 at 11:23 pm
What Mickey needs to remember is that all B-list celebraties EVENTUALLY morph into James Woods.
It’s Ape Law!
[Reply to this]
Reply from Yanni on January 15, 2008:
not Bruce Campbell too??!
Reply from Mr. Slick on January 15, 2008:
Even Bruce Campbell.
(Breaks my heart to say that.)
It is Ape Law!
6 Botchinator on Jan 15, 2008 at 8:01 am
He looks like he tried out for the movie “Face Off”" but took it too seriously.
[Reply to this]
7 SarahCanuck on Jan 15, 2008 at 2:56 pm
Yick. Wow.
[Reply to this]
Leave a Comment